Appreciating Systems

Appreciating Systems for Genuine Efficiency
Home » Posts tagged 'network'

Le peer to peer #p2p : nouvelle formation sociale, nouveau modèle civilisationnel – @P2PFoundation

Un article d’introduction très complet sur le peer-2-peer (pair à pair) de la part de la P2P Foundation.

La plupart des lecteurs sont familiers avec le concept de ‘peer to peer’ dans le domaine technologique, et spécifiquement, en tant que technologie de base pour le partage de fichiers, et connaissent les nombreuses controverses suscitées par l’échange (en fait : le ‘partage’) de contenus musicaux et audiovisuels. Notre propre conception du peer to peer, ou ‘pair à pair’ est bien plus large. Il s’agit en fait d’une dynamique intersubjective caractéristique des réseaux distribués. Le but de cet essai est de montrer qu’il s’agit d’une véritable nouvelle forme d’organisation sociale, apte à produire et échanger des biens, à créer de la valeur. Celle-ci est la conséquence d’un nouvel imaginaire social, et possède le potentiel de devenir le pilier d’un nouveau mode d’économie politique, voire d’un nouveau type de civilisation. Pour cela, nous allons d’abord définir le P2P, décrire en bref ces manifestations, et le différencier d’autres modalités d’échange intersubjectif tel que le marché, la hiérarchie, l’économie du don. →

Source: Le peer to peer : nouvelle formation sociale, nouveau modèle civilisationnel – P2P Foundation

#AI has surpassed us already and made us its slaves.

I was thinking about the recent news of renowned scientists and experts warning us against Artificial Intelligence that could surpass us. Unfortunately, I think this happened already without us knowing it, and, what most, it has made us its slaves (or we’ve inadvertently submitted ourselves to it).

Read more »

Using Emergence to Scale Social Innovation

I just discovered this astounding article from Wheatley and Frieze on Using Emergence to Scale Social Innovation.

I do think the way social networking is done today is broken – or immature to say the least. How are we supposed to create working networks and provoke emergence the way Wheatley explains it, if we stick to groups of people?

What’s important in a network: the people that make it of the contributions they make?

When you look today at the way social networks work, you see communities of people, connected through people. IMHO, that’s not the way it’s supposed to work (it may be flattening to one’s ego to have loads of followers, but I challenge you to find any real usefulness in this kind of network).

Indeed, we can see people intuitively knowing this fact since they tend to agregate around dedicated web sites on specific topics. Look at Google Groups, LinkedIn groups or even Facebook groups! What connect these people are the topics around which they network. Yet, one topic alone isn’t enough. How are the topics connected?

The power isn’t in the @ (how people are now mentionned, such as @nicolasstampf for instance, but in the # (hash tag: the way topics are mentioned). Yet, today, social networks are organized around people. When you want informations about some #topic, you need to find your @people to identify when some #topic has been mentioned. Or to search a whole social network for these mentions (eg. Twitter). How inefficient is that?

The Next Wave: how I see the future of #social #networking & blogging on Internet

February 20th, 2013 Posted in Lean, Uncategorized Tags: , , , , , ,

Somesh CirclesThis is something I’ve been pondering since quite some time.

  • Twitter is too short to make for long discourses, and you have to find people, then subscribe to them (not Lean!)
  • Blogs you have to search for and subscribe (not Lean!)
  • #hashtags are a cool way to mark content (so do categories and tags in blog posts)

So here’s what I have in mind for the next wave of social platforms (see picture on the right). It would basically work as this:

  1. people tell the system of what they are interested in using specific #tags
  2. you post whatever interesting content of some kind of a blogging platform and you categorize and #tag your post with as much as necessary #tags your piece of work mandates
  3. the article gets notified to some system: title, @author, all #tags
  4. people who subscribed to some of the #tags you used get notified of your publication
  5. because it provokes some insights in you, you comment back in the system, which notifies other people that the initial blog post is gaining traction. Other people comment as well, or write their own blog posts which get connected to yours in the system…

So, there’s a virtuous circle: you blog, it gets tweeted, people receive it through their #tags subscription, they react and post some more, which get tweeted as well, etc.

This is what (the now defunct) Google Wave ought to become IMO. Only that I removed the constraint of requiring bloggers to belong to Wave or some dedicated blog platform.

 

Mail List

Join the mailing list

Check your email and confirm the subscription